Pair of Vintage Old School Fru

Gaviota assembly implies that changes are statewide - not limited to just one park

Naturists on shores are the ones who are changed. It is not a situation that can be solved by offering an on-line "meetup group" at One Beach as a stand-in for bottoms in the sand throughout the state.
Published by: Naturist Education Foundation, The Nude & Natural Newsletter - September 2011 version
GAVIOTA STATE PARK, California -
The gratuitous dressing down got the attention of Dennis Craig Smith. Smith politely asked for a meeting with the DPR management responsible for Gaviota.
Dennis Craig Smith, Place Rep.
http://www.chitownbutts.com/cgi-bin/sites/out.cgi?id=hotfatty&url=https://beachspy.site , formal and otherwise, have not been unusual. At that meeting, Falat said that his rangers would continue following protocol that has been centered on the Rich Rozzelle Dan Falat Dennis Craig Smith, NAC Region Rep. Cahill Policy. In the event of a grievance, an established procedure allowed for the timely mitigation of "user battle," and the subsequent restoration of private liberties for individuals who pick nudity.
http://www.powdertech.no/web/Login.aspx?ReturnUrl=https://nudebeach.cc
Having been put in place in 1979 by former DPR Director Russell Cahill, the Cahill Policy let a flawed but effective means of handling for clothing-optional recreation in units of the State Park system. However, when DPR Director Ruth Coleman signed a directive that terminated Cahill at San Onofre State Beach in 2008, the Parks Department was left with no statewide policy regarding clothing optional recreation. While one national nudist organization expressed the opinion that Cahill would stay in force at California state parks that weren't named San Onofre, most naturists comprehended that dream to be neither credible nor realistic.
Dan Falat
The Naturist Action Committee has pointed out since 2008 that if DPR could abrogate Cahill at one park, it could do so at any park - or at all parks.

On September 1, 2011, Superintendent Falat and District Superintendent Rozzelle met with Dennis Smith and a little handful of naturists in the DPR office at Refugio State Beach. Both Parks Department employees revealed no hesitation in showing Falat's self-confidence from a year ago as the outright untruth it had become.
After the meeting, Smith sent an e-mail to members of Friends of Gaviota. "I do wish I had better news to report after our meeting with Rich Rozzelle and Dan Falat," he wrote.
Smith continued: "The mantra was: the Cahill Policy is dead, and Regulation 4322 outlaws nudity on state park property.' For decades we appreciated hassle free clothing discretionary use and this looks to be on the brink of being a true thing of the past. http://stats-tracking.com/r?url=https://videonudist.com have closed Trail #6 at San Onofre State Beach to nudity, and it appears clear they have been intent on doing it on all the other naturist beaches in the state."
An important goal of the meeting was to file concern and indignation at the combative and officious manner in which the ranger had addressed the beachgoers to whom he was giving nudity citations. Smith reports that upon mention of the ranger's demeaning morality lecture, "the mood of the officials turned hostile immediately, and we were accused of 'slandering' their officers." Smith says that Rozzelle and Falat characterized naturists as "being the ones who've been abusive and rude to the park personnel, who are simply doing their duty.'"
Smith reminded Falat and Rozzelle of the cooperative efforts by which Friends of Gaviota have participated over the years by sticking up for appropriate standards of behavior on the strand and by arranging plage clean-ups [NAC Newsletter, August, 2011]. Superintendent Falat dismissed the good works with a result that directly compared naturists to felons, saying: "If twenty cocaine users on a sand save a drowning man, we'll still detain em all"
Who's slandering whom?
On one day, naturists were appreciating State Park beaches lawfully, under the Cahill Policy. Suddenly, naturists in State Parks throughout the state were offenders.
Ticketing for nudity is not being confined to San Onofre nude beach and Gaviota. Citations have been given by DPR rangers at Garrapata State Park in Monterey County and Lake Perris State Recreation Area in Riverside County. Still, those who recently accepted the DPR fiction that the Cahill Policy would continue to be respected outside of San Onofre are now anticipated to embrace DPR's next "project."
"One Beach" isn't just the name of an online film that's being sponsored by a vintner. It is the working title of a DPR scheme to close all state parks to clothing-optional use - except for just ONE BEACH. Because the recognized naturist user group at that particular playa does not accept the new anti-nudity policy throughout the state, DPR and its accomplice are looking to an on-line "meetup group" as a replacement.
Nude Playa Blogs and Posts About By Young Naturists and Young Naturists America
Tags: california, laws, modesty, Naturist Action Committee NAC, naked beach, politics
Category: Naked News, Unclothed Beach, Public Nudity and Being Naked In Public, Social Activism, Social Nudity Websites
Back to posts
This post has no comments - be the first one!

UNDER MAINTENANCE